X-Efficiency
Comments are welcome at X.Efficiency@gmail.com
Saturday, September 08, 2007
What is X-Efficiency?
- "A monopolist may be X-inefficient either because it does not have an incentive to be more efficient due to lack of competition or it does not have the opportunity to observe and learn from other more efficient firms in the industry. In an industry high profits may imply high prices due to x-inefficiency. However, excess profits do not necessarily mean that consumers are paying higher prices. And, lack of excess profit does not necessarily indicate competition or cost efficiency." Leibenstein, Harvey. 1966. "Allocative Efficiency vs. 'X-Efficiency'," American Economic Review 56, (June), pp. 392-415
Blogs of Friends
- Dave Radio
- Hacks and Wonks
- I'm Here at a Place on a Thing in a Space
- In The Dead of the Night
- Leone's Blog
- Mentok the Mind-Taker
- Responsible Government League
- Stardog Photos
- V for Victory
- When Irish Eyes Are Smiling
About Economics
- Aplia Econ Blog
- Becker-Posner Blog (The)
- Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal
- Brad DeLong's Website
- Brad Setser's Web Log
- EC 10: Principles of Economics at Harvard
- Economist (The)
- Freakonomics Authors' Blog
- Greg Mankiw's Blog
- Marginal Revolution - By Tyler Cowen & Alex Tabarrok
- More to come....
Other Links
About Current Events & Politics
- Getting It Right - By Erin Airton
- Norman Spectator - By Norman Spector
- Public Eye Online
- Warren Kinsella
- More to come....
Previous Posts
- Is John Tory's Campaign over???
- Mark Your Calendar!!
- Glorifying Call Girls (Sugar-Babies), Johns (Sugar...
- Very Interesting Article from the National Post!!
- Study: Canadians and Their Non-Voting Political Ac...
- It is True that Trade Lowers Inflation
- Another Free Trade Deal!!
- More Proof of Higher Gasoline Tax Will Work
- Equalization
- Evil Economists!!
1 Comments:
Tory needs to read that piece by Tom Flanagan in the G&M last weekend.
Man, I never thought I'd ever recommend anything by Tom Flanagan to anybody, but these are the crazy topsy-turvy times in which we live, eh? Old Reformers preaching moderation, old PCers talking creationism.
What's next? Peter Mackay does something honourable or Maurice Vellacott says something intelligent? ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home